The sedan entered the retention pond and began sinking nose-first.
It was January 16, 2024, in Midlothian, Virginia. The air temperature was 18 degrees. Thin ice covered parts of the pond. Inside the vehicle was Joyce Byrd, 66, who could not get out on her own.
Matthew R. Bartholomew saw the car in the water.
He was 43 years old and worked as a police officer. The situation in front of him was moving quickly. A vehicle in water does not stay accessible for long. Once it tips, fills, or sinks farther, every option becomes harder.
Bartholomew entered the pond.
The water was freezing. The ice around the vehicle made movement more difficult. He swam to the sedan and tried to reach Byrd, but he could not break the glass with his hands.
June 12: $100 Turns Into $100,000?
I’ll get straight to the point because there’s not much time left…
The SpaceX IPO is scheduled for June 12…
And Elon Musk is predicting anyone who gets in today will have a chance to turn…
$100 into $100,000…
$500 into $500,000…
And $1,000 into $1 million!
But you cannot wait until after the IPO.
After the IPO, it will be too late…
And you’ll likely never see an opportunity like this again.
This IPO will only happen one time.
That first attempt did not work.
So he turned back.
Bartholomew swam to shore and retrieved a police baton and rope. Then he entered the pond again.
The second trip mattered because the car was still sinking. The rear of the sedan remained more accessible than the front, but the window was narrowing. Cold water not only threatens the person inside the vehicle. It also slows the rescuer. It affects breathing, strength, and coordination.
Bartholomew reached the car again.
Using the baton, he broke the rear window. That created the opening he had not been able to make the first time. He then reached inside and pulled Byrd from the vehicle.
The rescue was still not finished.
Getting someone out of a sinking car is only part of the work. The person still has to be moved through the water to safety, and in freezing conditions, time keeps pressing even after the extraction.
A rope helped make that possible.
Bartholomew and Byrd were pulled back toward shore. Others assisted from land, helping bring them out of the pond.
Byrd survived.
Bartholomew survived, too.
The first effort failed because the glass would not break. The second worked because he returned with the right tools.
That is the part worth noticing.
He did not treat the failed first attempt as the end of the rescue. He adjusted the method while the sedan was still in the pond and the water was still taking it down.
The car was sinking.
He went back in.
What He Did And Why It Is Worth Noticing
Matthew R. Bartholomew entered a freezing retention pond, swam to a sinking sedan, returned to shore for a baton and rope when he could not break the glass, went back into the water, broke the rear window, and pulled Joyce Byrd from the vehicle.
That is what he did.
It is worth noticing because the first attempt did not solve the problem.
Bartholomew had to leave the vehicle, get the right tools, and return while the car was still sinking and the water remained dangerously cold.
The decision was not only to enter the pond.
It was to go back.
A woman was trapped inside a sinking car. Bartholomew found the window that could be broken and helped bring her out.
That changed what happened next.
If the first attempt to reach someone trapped in a sinking car failed, would you go back into the water with another plan?